Car comparison

Opel Grandland X 1.6 TurbovsMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Opel Grandland X

1.6 Turbo

180 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Skyactiv-X

180 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,425 kg
    3,142 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    514 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    111 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    980 km
    609 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
224Nm165lb-ft
Curb weight
1,425kg3,142lb
1,538kg3,391lb
Gross weight
2,000kg4,409lb
2,042kg4,502lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
84.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
81.1s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
52.6s
Calculated
67.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
146Nm/t97lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
914km568mi
Calculated
980km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,477mm176in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,856mm73in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,609mm63in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,595mm63in
1,565mm62in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
188mm7in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
514L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,652L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
53L
48L
CO2 emissions
132g/km
111g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Opel Grandland X 1.6 TurboMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-XPowerTorque
  • Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo5,500 rpm1,750 rpm5,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X6,000 rpm3,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
52.6 s
67.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
224 Nm
165 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
1,538 kg
3,391 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo and Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X and Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
914 km
568 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
980 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
180 hp
134 kW
8.9 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.8 s
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
OpelGrandland X1.6 Turbo
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleOpelGrandland X1.6 TurboMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
224 Nm
165 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,425 kg
3,142 lb
1,538 kg
3,391 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
514 L
18.2 cu ft
Length
4,477 mm
176.3 in
Height
1,609 mm
63.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
914 km
568 mi
980 km
609 mi
CO2 score
132 g/km
111 g/km
Trunk score
514 L
18.2 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleOpel Grandland X 1.6 TurboMazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo

  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Is 113 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 84 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X

  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 66 km (41 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 21 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo
Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 Turbo
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.6 Turbo
20d
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsJaguarF-Pace20d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.6 Turbo
330TSI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.6 Turbo
2.0 D4
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
2.0 Skyactiv-X
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-XvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.6 Turbo
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 Turbo
2.0 T4
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolvoXC402.0 T4
1.6 Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
1.6 Turbo
2.0 TDI
VS
OpelGrandland X1.6 TurbovsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Opel Grandland X 1.6 Turbo vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 Skyactiv-X - car comparison - FastVsFaster