Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200dvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)

GLB 200d

150 hp1951 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2023
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d

  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,040 km
    646 mi
  • Largest trunk
    570 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,407kg3,102lb
Gross weight
2,195kg4,839lb
1,927kg4,248lb
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
To 99% top speed
85.0s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
77.0s99% target: 196 km/h / 122 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
70.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
93hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
151Nm/t101lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,040km646mi
Calculated
981km609mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,951cc119cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,834mm72in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,662mm65in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,829mm111in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,605mm63in
-
Rear track
1,606mm63in
-
Ground clearance
135mm5in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
570L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,805L
1,406L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
52L
51L
CO2 emissions
133g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200dMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d3,400-4,440 rpm1,400-2,600 rpm4,690 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
70.7 s
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,407 kg
3,102 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
198 km/h
123 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d9.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
93 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
1,040 km
646 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
981 km
609 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
150 hp
112 kW
9.0 s
204 km/h
127 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
8.8 s
198 km/h
123 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
198 km/h
123 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
9.0 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200d
93 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.8 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
198 km/h
123 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,407 kg
3,102 lb
Fuel consumption
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,662 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
1,040 km
646 mi
981 km
609 mi
CO2 score
133 g/km
-
Trunk score
570 L
20.1 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
93 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.7 kg/hp
107 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200dMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.75 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.08 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used750 L198 US gal165 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,313 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d

  • Has 107 Nm more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 59 km (37 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 140 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Is 198 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GLB 200d
GLB 200d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLB 200d
GLB 200+ 85 kWh
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 200+ 85 kWh
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
GLB 200d
GLA 200d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
GLB 200d
GLA 200d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 200d
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
GLB 200d
GLA 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 200dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 200
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster