Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSIvsMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Cross

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Mazda CX-30

2.0 e-Skyactiv G

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,255 kg
    2,767 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    455 L
  • Best overall score
    54/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Lowest city consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    889 km
    552 mi
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
213Nm157lb-ft
Curb weight
1,255kg2,767lb
1,477kg3,256lb
Gross weight
1,790kg3,946lb
1,995kg4,398lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
195 km/h
121 mph
To 99% top speed
79.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
78.6s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
9.1s
0-200 km/h
49.8s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
755km469mi
Calculated
889km552mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,235mm167in
4,395mm173in
Width
1,782mm70in
1,795mm71in
Height
1,584mm62in
1,540mm61in
Wheelbase
2,551mm100in
2,655mm105in
Front track
1,534mm60in
-
Rear track
1,512mm60in
-
Ground clearance-
175mm7in
Trunk volume
455L
430L
Max trunk volume
1,281L
1,406L
Doors
4
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
40L
48L
CO2 emissions
121g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv GPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI-1,500-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G6,000 rpm4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
9.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
49.8 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
195 km/h
121 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
213 Nm
157 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1,255 kg
2,767 lb
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1,477 kg
3,256 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
195 km/h
121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI8.5 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G9.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI and Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
755 km
469 mi
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
889 km
552 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
150 hp
112 kW
9.1 s
195 km/h
121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,235 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,584 mm
62.4 in
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.1 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
8.5 s
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
9.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
213 Nm
157 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
9.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Lightness
1,255 kg
2,767 lb
1,477 kg
3,256 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,235 mm
166.7 in
Height
1,584 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,540 mm
60.6 in
Range score
755 km
469 mi
889 km
552 mi
CO2 score
121 g/km
-
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
102 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSIMazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI

  • Has 37 Nm more
  • Is 222 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G

  • Has 134 km (83 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.5 TSI
280TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-32.0i
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.5 TSI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
35 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1.5 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
18d
VS
MazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv GvsBMWX2 (F39)18d
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI vs Mazda CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G - car comparison - FastVsFaster