Volkswagen T-Cross
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,255 kg2,767 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range962 km597 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,255kg2,767lb | 1,264kg2,787lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 75.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.9s Calculated | 59.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 755km469mi Calculated | 962km597mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,235mm167in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,782mm70in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,584mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,551mm100in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,281L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 121g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.9 s | 59.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 1,264 kg 2,787 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 755 km 469 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 962 km 597 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb | 1,264 kg 2,787 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 755 km 469 mi | 962 km 597 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 121 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.28 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,391 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 207 km (129 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























