Maserati Shamal
Car comparison
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32VvsMitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi 3000 GT
3.0 i 24V 4x4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Most powerful326 hp243 kW
- Highest torque436 Nm322 lb-ft
- Lightest1,417 kg3,124 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326hp243kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 436Nm322lb-ft | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,417kg3,124lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,217cc196cu in | 2,972cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,100mm161in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,512mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,550mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 2,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW |
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has 40 hp more than Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 5.3 s |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 5.0 s |
Although Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V has more power, Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | 326 hp 243 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiShamal3.2 i V8 32V | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp 243 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 436 Nm 322 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,417 kg 3,124 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Shamal 3.2 i V8 32V
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 29 Nm more
- Is 328 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























