Nissan 300 ZX (Z32)
Car comparison
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin TurbovsMitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi 3000 GT
3.0 i 24V 4x4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,644 kg3,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk326 L
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 375Nm277lb-ft | 407Nm300lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,644kg3,624lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 625km388mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,960cc181cu in | 2,972cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,555mm179in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,255mm49in | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 75L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 has 3 hp more than Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 5.9 s |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 625 km 388 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Is 101 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 166 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























