Nissan 300 ZX (Z32)
Car comparison
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin TurbovsChevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Most powerful285 hp213 kW
- Highest torque441 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight173 hp/t129 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,644 kg3,624 lb
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 285hp213kW |
| Torque | 375Nm277lb-ft | 441Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,644kg3,624lb | 1,644kg3,624lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 1,922kg4,237lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 23.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 625km388mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,960cc181cu in | 5,737cc350cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,907mm193in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,255mm49in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 5,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 23.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 has 2 hp more than Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 5.9 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 6.0 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | 285 hp 213 kW | 6.0 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | ChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 285 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | 441 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 625 km 388 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Chevrolet Camaro IV Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 66 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























