Mitsubishi 3000 GT
Car comparison
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4vsNissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 300 ZX (Z32)
3.0 Twin Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful286 hp213 kW
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Lightest1,644 kg3,624 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk326 L
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 283hp211kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 375Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,644kg3,624lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 81.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s Calculated | 21.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 625km388mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,972cc181cu in | 2,960cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,555mm179in | 4,520mm178in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,255mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,555mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 160L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: Power / Torque
- Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 21.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW |
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 has 3 hp more than Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 5.0 s |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 625 km 388 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Is 101 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 166 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























