Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 · Stage 3vsLynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 · Stage 2vsLynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 · Stage 1vsLynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03
+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)
Lynk & Co 03
+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)
Lynk & Co 03
+ 2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Largest trunk414 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW+127 hp | 330hp246kW+76 hp | 300hp224kW+46 hp | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft+193 Nm | 473Nm348lb-ft+123 Nm | 427Nm315lb-ft+77 Nm | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,620kg3,571lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 276 km/h 171 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.9s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph-10.1 s Calculated | 50.5s99% target: 273 km/h / 170 mph-8.5 s Calculated | 52.9s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph-6.2 s Calculated | 59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s-1.3 s | 5.0s-0.9 s | 5.3s-0.6 s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.1s-6.2 s Calculated | 14.3s-4.0 s Calculated | 15.8s-2.5 s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s-1.2 s Calculated | 4.8s-0.8 s Calculated | 5.1s-0.5 s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s-1.6 s Calculated | 12.9s-1.0 s Calculated | 13.2s-0.6 s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 204hp/t152kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,677mm184in | 4,677mm184in | 4,677mm184in | 4,677mm184in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in | 1,840mm72in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,461mm58in | 1,461mm58in | 1,461mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | 132mm5in | 132mm5in | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 414L | 414L | 414L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1) 300 hp: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 254 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | 5.1 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.1 s | 14.3 s | 15.8 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 276 km/h 171 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.6 s | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.9 s | 11.2 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s | 13.2 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 381 hp 284 kW |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 330 hp 246 kW |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 254 hp 189 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp has 127 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 254 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 254 hp and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp: 127 hp (95 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 276 km/h 171 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 4.6 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 5.0 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 5.3 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 254 hp: 1.3 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hp and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1) 300 hp, separated by only 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 649 km 403 mi |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 649 km 403 mi |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 649 km 403 mi |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 649 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 381 hp 284 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.0 s | 276 km/h 171 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.3 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3)381 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2)330 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1)300 hp | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5254 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 473 Nm 348 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 276 km/h 171 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 649 km 403 mi | 649 km 403 mi | 649 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 204 hp/t 152 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hp | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 1) 300 hp | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 254 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 3) 381 hp
- Has 51 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 (Stage 2) 330 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























