Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5vsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2019
P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Largest trunk414 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,589 kg3,503 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,589kg3,503lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 65.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,677mm184in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 410L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250 and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.5 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,589 kg 3,503 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2019 P250
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 31 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























