Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5vsAUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 Sedan (C8)
45 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range900 km559 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,340kg5,159lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 61.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 18.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,677mm184in | 4,939mm194in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,886mm74in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,924mm115in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 530L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 5,250-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 18.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI has 11 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5.9 s |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 6.0 s |
Although AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI has more power, Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 649 km 403 mi |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | AUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 | AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 Sedan (C8) 45 TFSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 251 km (156 mi) more estimated range
- Has 116 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























