Car comparison

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5vsJaguar XF (X260) 25t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 03

+ 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2022
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

25t

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    157 hp/t
    117 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 25t

  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,014 km
    630 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5JaguarXF (X260)25t
Power
254hp189kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
1,629kg3,591lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
2,260kg4,982lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
244 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
63.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
18.3s
Calculated
22.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
649km403mi
Calculated
1,014km630mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,677mm184in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,840mm72in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,461mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,730mm107in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,587mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,587mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
132mm5in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
414L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
74L
CO2 emissions-
166g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5Jaguar XF (X260) 25tPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)25t5,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5JaguarXF (X260)25t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.3 s
22.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
244 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
JaguarXF (X260)25t
250 hp
186 kW

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 25t.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25t and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)25t
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
JaguarXF (X260)25t
1,629 kg
3,591 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)25t
244 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T55.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)25t6.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25t
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)25t
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
649 km
403 mi
JaguarXF (X260)25t
1,014 km
630 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)25t
250 hp
186 kW
6.7 s
244 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,677 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
JaguarXF (X260)25t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)25t
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25t
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5JaguarXF (X260)25t
Power
254 hp
189 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
244 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
1,629 kg
3,591 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,677 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
649 km
403 mi
1,014 km
630 mi
CO2 score
-
166 g/km
Trunk score
414 L
14.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km12.78 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi20.56 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,916 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 9 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar XF (X260) 25t

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 364 km (226 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

+ 2.0TD T5
330i
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)330i
25t
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25tvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
+ 2.0TD T5
C 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
25t
25t
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25tvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
+ 2.0TD T5
730i
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019730i
25t
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25tvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
+ 2.0TD T5
C 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300
25t
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25tvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
+ 2.0TD T5
E 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 300
25t
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25tvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
+ 2.0TD T5
P250
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
+ 2.0TD T5
45 TFSI
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 25t - car comparison - FastVsFaster