Lynk & Co 03
Car comparison
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
E 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 254hp189kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 63.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.3s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,677mm184in | 4,923mm194in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,730mm107in | 2,939mm116in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 132mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 414L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | - | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.3 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 has 4 hp more than Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5.
The biggest power difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 has more power, Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 649 km 403 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 254 hp 189 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 300
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 351 km (218 mi) more estimated range
- Has 126 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























