Car comparison

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5vsJaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lynk & Co 03

+ 2.0TD T5

254 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2022
VS

Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0i

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Lightest
    1,620 kg
    3,571 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    157 hp/t
    117 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    62/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
254hp189kW
250hp186kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
1,620kg3,571lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight
2,100kg4,630lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
69.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
18.3s
Calculated
21.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
649km403mi
Calculated
831km517mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,677mm184in
4,962mm195in
Width
1,840mm72in
-
Height
1,461mm58in
1,456mm57in
Wheelbase
2,730mm107in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,587mm62in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,587mm62in
1,605mm63in
Ground clearance
132mm5in
-
Trunk volume
414L
459L
Max trunk volume-
1,484L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.3 s
21.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.3 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T55.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
649 km
403 mi
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
831 km
517 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
254 hp
189 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
250 hp
186 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,677 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
459 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
254 hp
189 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,620 kg
3,571 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
414 L
14.6 cu ft
Length
4,677 mm
184.1 in
Height
1,461 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
459 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,962 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
Range score
649 km
403 mi
831 km
517 mi
Trunk score
414 L
14.6 cu ft
459 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
151 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

+ 2.0TD T5
330i
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsBMW3 Series Sedan (G20)330i
2.0i
25t
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0ivsJaguarXF (X260)25t
+ 2.0TD T5
C 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 300
2.0i
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0ivsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
+ 2.0TD T5
730i
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsBMW7 Series (G11 LCI)Facelift 2019730i
2.0i
25t
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0ivsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25t
+ 2.0TD T5
C 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 300
2.0i
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0ivsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
+ 2.0TD T5
E 300
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 300
2.0i
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0ivsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
+ 2.0TD T5
P250
VS
Lynk & Co03+ 2.0TD T5vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
2.0i
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0ivsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
Lynk & Co 03 + 2.0TD T5 vs Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster