Wiesmann Roadster MF3
Car comparison
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24VvsLotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 2)
1.8 i 16V 111R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest850 kg1,874 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 180Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,080kg2,381lb | 850kg1,874lb |
| Gross weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 49.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 3,860mm152in | 3,785mm149in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,160mm46in | 1,143mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,290mm90in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | 1,450mm57in | 1,457mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 115L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 38L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 7,800 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V has 39 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 850 kg 1,874 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5.9 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 4.9 s |
Although Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V has more power, Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb | 850 kg 1,874 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Is 230 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























