Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009 2.9vsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF3
3.0i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed263 km/h163 mph
- Most powerful255 hp190 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score82/100
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,080 kg2,381 lb
- Best power-to-weight214 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 255hp190kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 290Nm214lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,080kg2,381lb |
| Gross weight | 1,635kg3,605lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 92.4s99% target: 260 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 64.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s | 20.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | 600km373mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,893cc177cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,292mm51in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,290mm90in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,534mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 221g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 7,200 rpm | 4,400-6,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 20.5 s |
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 has 24 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 5.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 691 km 430 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 600 km 373 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 255 hp 190 kW | 5.9 s | 263 km/h 163 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 20092.9 | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 255 hp 190 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 263 km/h 163 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | 600 km 373 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 221 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9 | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 2.9
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 91 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 255 kg lighter
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























