Wiesmann Roadster MF3
Car comparison
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24VvsAUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Lightest1,080 kg2,381 lb
- Best power-to-weight214 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score60/100
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range811 km504 mi
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,080kg2,381lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 24.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 600km373mi Calculated | 811km504mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,860mm152in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,750mm69in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,160mm46in | 1,358mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,290mm90in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,450mm57in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,558mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 700L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 172g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V has 20 hp more than AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 600 km 373 mi |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 811 km 504 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 5.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | AUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 600 km 373 mi | 811 km 504 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 172 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Has 20 hp more
- Is 345 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 211 km (131 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























