AUDI TT Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24VvsWiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF3
3.0i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range632 km392 mi
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Lightest1,080 kg2,381 lb
- Best power-to-weight214 hp/t159 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,080kg2,381lb |
| Gross weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 64.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 20.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 278Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 632km392mi Calculated | 600km373mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 3,860mm152in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,160mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,290mm90in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,450mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 6,300 rpm | 2,500-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5,900 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 20.5 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V has 19 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 5.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V and Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 632 km 392 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 600 km 373 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 250 hp 186 kW | 5.9 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8J)3.2i V6 24V | WiesmannRoadster MF33.0i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,080 kg 2,381 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 632 km 392 mi | 600 km 373 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V | Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 3.2i V6 24V
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF3 3.0i 24V
- Is 410 kg lighter
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























