Porsche Boxster (987)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7vsLotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 2)
1.8 i 16V 111R
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7
- Fastest top speed256 km/h159 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk130 L
- Best overall score48/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score26/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Lightest850 kg1,874 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 180Nm133lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 850kg1,874lb |
| Gross weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | - |
| Top speed | 256 km/h 159 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.5s99% target: 253 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 49.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,687cc164cu in | 1,796cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,329mm170in | 3,785mm149in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,143mm45in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,300mm91in |
| Front track | - | 1,457mm57in |
| Rear track | - | 1,503mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 121mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | 115L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 38L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 6,400 rpm | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 7,800 rpm | 6,800 rpm | 8,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | 256 km/h 159 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7 has 48 hp more than Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 850 kg 1,874 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 6.2 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 4.9 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7 has more power, Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R and Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.2 s | 256 km/h 159 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | 192 hp 143 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)2.7 | LotusElise (SERIES 2)1.8 i 16V 111R | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 180 Nm 133 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 256 km/h 159 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 850 kg 1,874 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) 2.7
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 2) 1.8 i 16V 111R
- Is 445 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























