Car comparison

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350hvsSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lexus NX II (AZ20)

350h

190 hp2487 ccGasolineFWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2021-present
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

GT TSI330

186 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    932 km
    579 mi
  • Largest trunk
    545 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    116 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.6 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    44/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLexusNX II (AZ20)350hSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190hp142kW
186hp139kW
Torque
239Nm176lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,810kg3,990lb
1,600kg3,527lb
Gross weight
2,320kg5,115lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
95.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
91.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
57.5s
Calculated
56.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
132Nm/t88lb-ft/ton
Calculated
200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
932km579mi
Calculated
896km556mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,487cc152cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,660mm183in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,883mm74in
Height
1,670mm66in
1,649mm65in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,605mm63in
-
Rear track
1,625mm64in
-
Ground clearance
195mm8in
-
Trunk volume
545L
463L
Max trunk volume
1,436L
1,607L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350hSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330PowerTorque
  • Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h6,000 rpm4,300-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3304,100-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLexusNX II (AZ20)350hSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
57.5 s
56.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
139 km/h
86 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h has 4 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
1,600 kg
3,527 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h8.7 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI3308.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
932 km
579 mi
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
896 km
556 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
186 hp
139 kW
8.8 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
186 hp
139 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.7 s
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLexusNX II (AZ20)350hSkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330
Power
190 hp
142 kW
186 hp
139 kW
Torque
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Range score
932 km
579 mi
896 km
556 mi
Trunk score
545 L
19.2 cu ft
463 L
16.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLexus NX II (AZ20) 350hSkoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 82 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330

  • Has 81 Nm more
  • Is 210 kg lighter
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

350h
300
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
GT TSI330
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
350h
200t
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
GT TSI330
2.0 D4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
350h
200
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusUX200
GT TSI330
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
GT TSI330
20d
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsJaguarF-Pace20d
350h
2.0i
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
GT TSI330
2.0 T4
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsVolvoXC402.0 T4
350h
2.2 CRDi
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
GT TSI330
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq IGT TSI330vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
350h
GLB 220d
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h vs Skoda Kodiaq I GT TSI330 - car comparison - FastVsFaster