Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Lexus NX II (AZ20)

350h

190 hp2487 ccGasolineFWDCVTNaturally aspiratedSUV2021-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    212 km/h
    132 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    105 hp/t
    78 kW/t
    9.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,184 km
    736 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
239Nm176lb-ft
Curb weight
1,905kg4,200lb
1,810kg3,990lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
2,320kg5,115lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
95.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
44.1s
Calculated
57.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
132Nm/t88lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,184km736mi
Calculated
932km579mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
2,487cc152cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,660mm183in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,865mm73in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,670mm66in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,625mm64in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
195mm8in
Trunk volume
477L
545L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,436L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLexus NX II (AZ20) 350hPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h6,000 rpm4,300-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.1 s
57.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 10 hp more than Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h.

The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
239 Nm
176 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
1,810 kg
3,990 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
932 km
579 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
190 hp
142 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
LexusNX II (AZ20)350h
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
239 Nm
176 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
1,810 kg
3,990 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Length
4,660 mm
183.5 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Range score
1,184 km
736 mi
932 km
579 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
545 L
19.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 211 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 251 km (156 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h

  • Is 95 kg lighter
  • Has 68 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
350h
300
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
350h
200t
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
350h
200
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsLexusUX200
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
40 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
350h
2.2 CRDi
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
350h
GLB 220d
VS
LexusNX II (AZ20)350hvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Lexus NX II (AZ20) 350h - car comparison - FastVsFaster