Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
280 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSedan2003-2005
Car comparison
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0vsLexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Lexus LS III · Facelift 2004
430 V8
290 hp4293 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2003-2006
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Most powerful290 hp216 kW
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range977 km607 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score64/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 383Nm282lb-ft | 434Nm320lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 505km314mi Calculated | 977km607mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 4,293cc262cu in |
| Length | 4,490mm177in | 5,015mm197in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,490mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,925mm115in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 570L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 84L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8PowerTorque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 has 10 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 5.9 s |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 6.1 s |
Although Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 977 km 607 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 505 km 314 mi | 977 km 607 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 | Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Is 490 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 51 Nm more
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 472 km (293 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Lexus LS III 430 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VII2.0 T
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusLS IV460 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution VI2.0
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusLS IVFacelift 2009460 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution V2.0
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusLS IVFacelift 2012460 V8
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsMitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsLexusES V (XV40)350
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsLexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsAcuraTL III (UA6/7)3.2 i V6 24V
MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0vsVolvoS60R 2.5i 20V
LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V