Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VvsLexus LS III · Facelift 2004 430 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LS III · Facelift 2004
430 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Highest torque434 Nm320 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range977 km607 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 434Nm320lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 60.1s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 19.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | 977km607mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 4,293cc262cu in |
| Length | 5,090mm200in | 5,015mm197in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,490mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,034mm119in | 2,925mm115in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 570L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 84L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 19.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has 10 hp more than Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6.6 s |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 6.1 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has more power, Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 780 km 485 mi |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 977 km 607 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | LexusLS IIIFacelift 2004430 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 434 Nm 320 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | 977 km 607 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V | Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Lexus LS III Facelift 2004 430 V8
- Has 23 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 197 km (122 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























