Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

D 275 3.0 V6

275 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    275 hp
    205 kW
  • Highest torque
    625 Nm
    461 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    136 hp/t
    101 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    175 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
275hp205kW
250hp186kW
Torque
625Nm461lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,029kg4,473lb
1,977kg4,359lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
94.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
81.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
29.7s
Calculated
30.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
779km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,803mm189in
4,688mm185in
Width-
1,902mm75in
Height
1,665mm66in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,644mm65in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,663mm65in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
251mm10in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
673L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,731L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
60L
CO2 emissions
175g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V63,500-4,250 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.7 s
30.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
154 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 has 25 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
2,029 kg
4,473 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
1,977 kg
4,359 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V67.0 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T56.8 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
1,000 km
621 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
779 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
7.0 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
Power
275 hp
205 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.8 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
2,029 kg
4,473 lb
1,977 kg
4,359 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
779 km
484 mi
CO2 score
175 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
673 L
23.8 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6

  • Has 25 hp more
  • Has 275 Nm more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 221 km (137 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 168 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5

  • Is 52 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

D 275 3.0 V6
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
D 275 3.0 V6
30d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
D 275 3.0 V6
2.0 P250
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
D 275 3.0 V6
50 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
2.0 T5
25t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-Pace25t
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
D 275 3.0 V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T5
2.0i
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T5vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
D 275 3.0 V6
550T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsChevroletEquinox III550T
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster