Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6vsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

D 275 3.0 V6

275 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

50 TDI

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Most powerful
    286 hp
    213 kW
  • Lightest
    1,870 kg
    4,123 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,066 km
    662 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
275hp205kW
286hp213kW
Torque
625Nm461lb-ft
620Nm457lb-ft
Curb weight
2,029kg4,473lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Gross weight-
2,565kg5,655lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
94.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
67.1s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
29.7s
Calculated
23.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton
Calculated
332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
1,066km662mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
2,967cc181cu in
Length
4,803mm189in
4,663mm184in
Width-
1,893mm75in
Height
1,665mm66in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,819mm111in
Front track
1,644mm65in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,663mm65in
1,609mm63in
Ground clearance
251mm10in
-
Trunk volume
673L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,731L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
65L
CO2 emissions
175g/km
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDIPowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V63,500-4,250 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm2,250-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.7 s
23.8 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI has 11 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
620 Nm
457 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
2,029 kg
4,473 lb
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
1,870 kg
4,123 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
241 km/h
150 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V67.0 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI5.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
1,000 km
621 mi
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
1,066 km
662 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
7.0 s
241 km/h
150 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
5.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.0 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
275 hp
205 kW
286 hp
213 kW
Torque
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
5.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
2,029 kg
4,473 lb
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
1,066 km
662 mi
CO2 score
175 g/km
162 g/km
Trunk score
673 L
23.8 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 123 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 159 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 66 km (41 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 13 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

D 275 3.0 V6
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
50 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
D 275 3.0 V6
30d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsBMWX7 (G07)30d
50 TDI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6
D 275 3.0 V6
2.0 P250
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
50 TDI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6
D 275 3.0 V6
30d V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
50 TDI
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
D 275 3.0 V6
2.0 T5
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
D 275 3.0 V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
50 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
D 275 3.0 V6
550T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsChevroletEquinox III550T
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 vs AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster