Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Velar

D 275 3.0 V6

275 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC40

2.0 T5

247 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    275 hp
    205 kW
  • Highest torque
    625 Nm
    461 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,000 km
    621 mi
  • Largest trunk
    673 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,680 kg
    3,704 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    164 g/km

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
275hp205kW
247hp184kW
Torque
625Nm461lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
2,029kg4,473lb
1,680kg3,704lb
Gross weight-
2,220kg4,894lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
94.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
74.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
29.7s
Calculated
28.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,000km621mi
Calculated
750km466mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,803mm189in
4,425mm174in
Width-
1,863mm73in
Height
1,665mm66in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,644mm65in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,663mm65in
1,626mm64in
Ground clearance
251mm10in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
673L
460L
Max trunk volume
1,731L
1,336L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
54L
CO2 emissions
175g/km
164g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6Volvo XC40 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V63,500-4,250 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm
VolvoXC402.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6VolvoXC402.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.7 s
28.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
157 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
VolvoXC402.0 T5
247 hp
184 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 has 28 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 28 hp (21 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
VolvoXC402.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
2,029 kg
4,473 lb
VolvoXC402.0 T5
1,680 kg
3,704 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T5
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V67.0 s
VolvoXC402.0 T56.5 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 has more power, Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
VolvoXC402.0 T5
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
1,000 km
621 mi
VolvoXC402.0 T5
750 km
466 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
275 hp
205 kW
7.0 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T5
247 hp
184 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
Power
275 hp
205 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
247 hp
184 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolvoXC402.0 T5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T5
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6VolvoXC402.0 T5
Power
275 hp
205 kW
247 hp
184 kW
Torque
625 Nm
461 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.5 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
2,029 kg
4,473 lb
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
673 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,803 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,665 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
1,000 km
621 mi
750 km
466 mi
CO2 score
175 g/km
164 g/km
Trunk score
673 L
23.8 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6

  • Has 28 hp more
  • Has 275 Nm more
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 250 km (155 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 213 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC40 2.0 T5

  • Is 349 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 11 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

D 275 3.0 V6
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
D 275 3.0 V6
30d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsBMWX7 (G07)30d
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
D 275 3.0 V6
2.0 P250
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
D 275 3.0 V6
50 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
D 275 3.0 V6
30d V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
D 275 3.0 V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
D 275 3.0 V6
550T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6vsChevroletEquinox III550T
2.0 T5
45 TFSI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T5vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 vs Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster