Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6vsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-Pace
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful275 hp205 kW
- Highest torque625 Nm461 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Lightest1,832 kg4,039 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions174 g/km
- Largest trunk1,234 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 275hp205kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,029kg4,473lb | 1,832kg4,039lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 85.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 308Nm/t206lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 890km553mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,803mm189in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | - | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,665mm66in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,644mm65in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,663mm65in | 1,634mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 251mm10in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 673L | 1,234L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,731L | 2,577L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | 174g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 3,500-4,250 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 has 25 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 and Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 7.0 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 890 km 553 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 275 hp 205 kW | 7.0 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover VelarD 275 3.0 V6 | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 275 hp 205 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,029 kg 4,473 lb | 1,832 kg 4,039 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 890 km 553 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | 174 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 673 L 23.8 cu ft | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6 | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Velar D 275 3.0 V6
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 260 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 110 km (69 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P250
- Is 197 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 561 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























