Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 P250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023

2.0 P250

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    254 hp
    189 kW
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
Power
254hp189kW
250hp186kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
365Nm269lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
1,875kg4,134lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
83.7s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
41.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
838km521mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
4,797mm189in
Width
1,890mm74in
2,041mm80in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,683mm66in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
214mm8in
Trunk volume
258L
748L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
1,811L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
5
Fuel tank
74L
83L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P2505,500 rpm1,300-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
41.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
147 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 4 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
365 Nm
269 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
1,875 kg
4,134 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P2507.5 s

Although Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: 4.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
838 km
521 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
250 hp
186 kW
7.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250
Power
254 hp
189 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
9.9 L/100 km
23.8 mpg US
28.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
838 km
521 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km17.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi27.88 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,599 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 185 Nm more
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 437 km (272 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250

  • Is 261 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 490 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2.0 P250
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
2.0 P250
45 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250vsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
2.0 P250
2.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
45 TFSI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsAUDIQ645 TFSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
450TSI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0 P250
2.0 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250vsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 - car comparison - FastVsFaster