Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar E-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,814 kg3,999 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score81/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best estimated range838 km521 mi
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 249hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,814kg3,999lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.3s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 83.7s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.4s Calculated | 41.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km429mi Calculated | 838km521mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,395mm173in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,984mm78in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,648mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,624mm64in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 214mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 601L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,386L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.4 s | 41.1 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 249 hp 186 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 has 1 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 1,814 kg 3,999 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 7.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 7.5 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 has more power, Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 691 km 429 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 838 km 521 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 249 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,814 kg 3,999 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 429 mi | 838 km 521 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 601 L 21.2 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar E-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Is 61 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Has 147 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























