Cadillac GT4
Car comparison
Cadillac GT4 28TvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2023
2.0 P250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Best estimated range838 km521 mi
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Cadillac GT4 28T
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Best power-to-weight135 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacGT428T | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 83.7s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.7s Calculated | 41.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 813km505mi Calculated | 838km521mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,633mm182in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,878mm74in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,535mm60in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 131mm5in | 214mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 289L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac GT4 28T: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacGT428T | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.7 s | 41.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 has 13 hp more than Cadillac GT4 28T.
The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 and Cadillac GT4 28T: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 813 km 505 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 838 km 521 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 237 hp 177 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac GT4 28T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacGT428T | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacGT428T | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20232.0 P250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 813 km 505 mi | 838 km 521 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 289 L 10.2 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac GT4 28T | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac GT4 28T
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2023 2.0 P250
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Has 459 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























