Car comparison

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 D200

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020

2.0 D200

204 hp1997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    212 km/h
    132 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,905 kg
    4,200 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,184 km
    736 mi
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
Power
200hp149kW
204hp152kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,905kg4,200lb
1,928kg4,251lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
92.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
44.1s
Calculated
55.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,184km736mi
Calculated
1,132km703mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,745mm187in
4,797mm189in
Width
1,890mm74in
2,041mm80in
Height
1,687mm66in
1,683mm66in
Wheelbase
2,870mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,644mm65in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,663mm65in
Ground clearance
175mm7in
251mm10in
Trunk volume
477L
748L
Max trunk volume
1,726L
1,811L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200PowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D2004,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.1 s
55.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
1,928 kg
4,251 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
1,132 km
703 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
204 hp
152 kW
8.2 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
8.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DLand RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200
Power
200 hp
149 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
1,928 kg
4,251 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Length
4,797 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,683 mm
66.3 in
Range score
1,184 km
736 mi
1,132 km
703 mi
Trunk score
477 L
16.8 cu ft
748 L
26.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 23 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 271 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Land Rover Range Rover Velar 2.0 D200
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 - car comparison - FastVsFaster