Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
2.0 D200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted212 km/h132 mph Restricted
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,905 kg4,200 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,184 km736 mi
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best power-to-weight106 hp/t79 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 92.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.1s Calculated | 55.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,184km736mi Calculated | 1,132km703mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.1 s | 55.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 has 4 hp more than Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.
The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,184 km 736 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 1,132 km 703 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,184 km 736 mi | 1,132 km 703 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 23 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 271 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























