Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
2.0 D200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,132 km703 mi
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | - |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 89.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.7s Calculated | 54.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,115km693mi Calculated | 1,132km703mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,509mm178in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,675mm66in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.7 s | 54.3 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 92 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 has 4 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 8.2 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,115 km 693 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 1,132 km 703 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,115 km 693 mi | 1,132 km 703 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Is 288 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 17 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























