AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Velar · Facelift 2020
2.0 D200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,204 km748 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk748 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 92.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.4s Calculated | 55.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,204km748mi Calculated | 1,132km703mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 2,041mm80in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,644mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,663mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 251mm10in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 748L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | 1,811L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.4 s | 55.4 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 7.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,204 km 748 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 1,132 km 703 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.2 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover VelarFacelift 20202.0 D200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,204 km 748 mi | 1,132 km 703 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 748 L 26.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI | Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Is 123 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover Velar Facelift 2020 2.0 D200
- Has 30 Nm more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 228 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























