Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III

3.0 D250

249 hp2997 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Fastest top speed
225 km/h
140 mph Unrestricted
219 km/h
136 mph Restricted
Most powerful
254 hp
189 kW
Lightest
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
Best power-to-weight
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
Best estimated range
1,276 km
793 mi
Best performance score
52/100
Best economy score
91/100

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.0 s
Highest torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Largest trunk
450 L
Best overall score
62/100
Best practicality score
84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250
Power	254hp189kW	249hp186kW
Torque	550Nm406lb-ft	600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight	2,136kg4,709lb	2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight	2,781kg6,131lb	3,220kg7,099lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Calculated	206 km/h 128 mph
To 99% top speed	99.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated	82.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.4s	8.0s
0-200 km/h	41.0s Calculated	60.1s Calculated
0-60 mph	7.9s Calculated	7.5s Calculated
Fuel consumption	5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK	8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.1s Calculated	15.8s Calculated
Power-to-weight	119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated	108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated	259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,276km793mi Calculated	988km614mi Calculated
Displacement	3,283cc200cu in	2,997cc183cu in
Length	4,995mm197in	4,946mm195in
Width	1,890mm74in	-
Height	1,710mm67in	1,820mm72in
Wheelbase	3,120mm123in	2,997mm118in
Front track	1,640mm65in	1,702mm67in
Rear track	1,645mm65in	1,704mm67in
Ground clearance	170mm7in	281mm11in
Trunk volume	258L	450L
Max trunk volume	1,971L	1,860L
Doors	5	5
Seats	6	5
Fuel tank	74L	80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	3,750 rpm	1,500-2,400 rpm	4,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	4,000 rpm	1,250-2,250 rpm	4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	7.9 s	7.5 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.4 s	8.0 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	41.0 s	60.1 s
Top speed	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph Limited	206 km/h 128 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.6 s	2.5 s
330 ft 101 m	6.9 s	6.7 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.5 s	10.2 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.5 s	13.3 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.1 s	15.8 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	143 km/h 89 mph	142 km/h 88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	254 hp 189 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	249 hp 186 kW

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 5 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	550 Nm 406 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	600 Nm 443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	2,136 kg 4,709 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	2,315 kg 5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	206 km/h 128 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	8.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	8.0 s

Although Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has more power, Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	1,276 km 793 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	988 km 614 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	254 hp 189 kW	8.4 s	Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	249 hp 186 kW	8.0 s	206 km/h 128 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D

Power	254 hp 189 kW
0-100 km/h	8.4 s
Top speed Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 6 seats
Trunk	258 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,995 mm 196.7 in
Height	1,710 mm 67.3 in

Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250

Power	249 hp 186 kW
0-100 km/h	8.0 s
Top speed 206 km/h 128 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	450 L 15.9 cu ft
Length	4,946 mm 194.7 in
Height	1,820 mm 71.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D

Power	254 hp 189 kW
0-100 km/h	8.4 s
Top speed Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 219 km/h136 mph

5.8 L/100 km

40.6 mpg US

48.7 mpg UK

Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250

Power	249 hp 186 kW
0-100 km/h	8.0 s
Top speed 206 km/h 128 mph

8.1 L/100 km

29.0 mpg US

34.9 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK	8.4 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK	8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D	119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp	5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250	108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp	8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D

Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250

Power

254 hp

189 kW

249 hp

186 kW

Torque

550 Nm

406 lb-ft

600 Nm

443 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.4 s

8.0 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

225 km/h140 mph

Restricted

219 km/h136 mph

206 km/h

128 mph

Lightness

2,136 kg

4,709 lb

2,315 kg

5,104 lb

Fuel consumption

5.8 L/100 km

40.6 mpg US

48.7 mpg UK

8.1 L/100 km

29.0 mpg US

34.9 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 6 seats
Trunk	258 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,995 mm 196.7 in
Height	1,710 mm 67.3 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	450 L 15.9 cu ft
Length	4,946 mm 194.7 in
Height	1,820 mm 71.7 in

Range score

1,276 km

793 mi

988 km

614 mi

Trunk score

258 L

9.1 cu ft

450 L

15.9 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

119 hp/t

89 kW/t

8.4 kg/hp

108 hp/t

80 kW/t

9.3 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D	Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250
Consumption	5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK	8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	10.15 LC100 km	14.17 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	16.33 LC100 mi	22.81 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	870 L230 US gal191 UK gal	1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,523 LC/year	2,126 LC/year