Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWhvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 D250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest2,315 kg5,104 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,385kg5,258lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,975kg6,559lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 82.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.5s Calculated | 60.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 988km614mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,863mm191in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,685mm66in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,030mm119in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,654mm65in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,659mm65in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 181mm7in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,675L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.5 s | 60.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 7.6 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 8.0 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 has more power, Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | 245 hp 183 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW | 8.0 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,385 kg 5,258 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 988 km 614 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (X294) EQE 300 98 kWh
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























