AUDI Q8 (4M)
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 D250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Lightest2,160 kg4,762 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk605 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 95.4s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 82.6s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 60.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 988km614mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,967cc181cu in | 2,997cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | - |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,679mm66in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,691mm67in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,755L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 4,000 rpm | 1,250-2,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 60.1 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 has 18 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 8.0 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 988 km 614 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.1 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 249 hp 186 kW | 8.0 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 (4M)45 TDI | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 D250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,160 kg 4,762 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 988 km 614 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 (4M) 45 TDI
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 D250
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























