Car comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4vsVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017

2.0 Si4

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Volkswagen Teramont

3.6 FSI V6

280 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4

Quickest 0-100 km/h
7.3 s
Fastest top speed
201 km/h
125 mph
Most powerful
300 hp
224 kW
Highest torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Lightest
2,083 kg
4,592 lb
Best power-to-weight
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
11.4 L/100 km
20.6 mpg US
24.8 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
214 g/km
Best estimated range
1,106 km
687 mi
Best performance score
52/100
Best economy score
82/100

Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

Best overall score
60/100
Best practicality score
91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power	300hp224kW	280hp209kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight	2,083kg4,592lb	2,105kg4,641lb
Gross weight	3,000kg6,614lb	2,700kg5,952lb
Top speed	201 km/h 125 mph	190 km/h 118 mph
To 99% top speed	73.0s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated	81.7s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	7.3s	8.9s
0-200 km/h	86.5s Calculated	-
0-60 mph	6.9s Calculated	8.4s Calculated
Fuel consumption	9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK	10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK	14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK	8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile	15.3s Calculated	16.5s Calculated
Power-to-weight	144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated	133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated	171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	1,106km687mi Calculated	660km410mi Calculated
Displacement	1,997cc122cu in	3,597cc220cu in
Length	4,879mm192in	5,036mm198in
Width	-	1,989mm78in
Height	1,803mm71in	1,769mm70in
Wheelbase	2,923mm115in	2,979mm117in
Front track	1,693mm67in	-
Rear track	1,686mm66in	-
Ground clearance	278mm11in	203mm8in
Trunk volume	221L	-
Max trunk volume	1,686L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	7	5
Fuel tank	104L	70L
CO2 emissions	214g/km	247g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	5,500 rpm	1,500-4,000 rpm	5,750 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	6,200 rpm	3,500 rpm	6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.9 s	8.4 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	7.3 s	8.9 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	86.5 s	-
Top speed	201 km/h 125 mph	190 km/h 118 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.4 s	2.6 s
330 ft 101 m	6.5 s	7.0 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.9 s	10.6 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.8 s	13.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	15.3 s	16.5 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	145 km/h 90 mph	135 km/h 84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	300 hp 224 kW
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	280 hp 209 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	360 Nm 266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	2,083 kg 4,592 lb
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	2,105 kg 4,641 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	201 km/h 125 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	190 km/h 118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	7.3 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	1,106 km 687 mi
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	660 km 410 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	300 hp 224 kW	7.3 s	201 km/h 125 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	280 hp 209 kW	8.9 s	190 km/h 118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 201 km/h 125 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	221 L 7.8 cu ft
Length	4,879 mm 192.1 in
Height	1,803 mm 71.0 in

VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	8.9 s
Top speed 190 km/h 118 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,036 mm 198.3 in
Height	1,769 mm 69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	7.3 s
Top speed 201 km/h 125 mph

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	8.9 s
Top speed 190 km/h 118 mph

10.6 L/100 km

22.2 mpg US

26.6 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK	7.3 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK	8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4	144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp	10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4

VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6

Power

300 hp

224 kW

280 hp

209 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

360 Nm

266 lb-ft

Acceleration

7.3 s

8.9 s

Top speed

201 km/h

125 mph

190 km/h

118 mph

Lightness

2,083 kg

4,592 lb

2,105 kg

4,641 lb

Fuel consumption

9.4 L/100 km

25.0 mpg US

30.1 mpg UK

10.6 L/100 km

22.2 mpg US

26.6 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	221 L 7.8 cu ft
Length	4,879 mm 192.1 in
Height	1,803 mm 71.0 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,036 mm 198.3 in
Height	1,769 mm 69.6 in

Range score

1,106 km

687 mi

660 km

410 mi

CO2 score

214 g/km

247 g/km

Trunk score

221 L

7.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

144 hp/t

107 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

133 hp/t

99 kW/t

7.5 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4	Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Consumption	9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK	10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	16.45 LC100 km	18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	26.47 LC100 mi	29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal	1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,468 LC/year	2,783 LC/year