Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

320 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2015-2017
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2012-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    2,078 kg
    4,581 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    186 g/km
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

  • Most powerful
    339 hp
    253 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    1,207 km
    750 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
320hp239kW
339hp253kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,078kg4,581lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Gross weight
2,750kg6,063lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
84.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
86.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
27.3s
Calculated
41.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
888km551mi
Calculated
1,207km750mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,676mm66in
1,690mm67in
Rear track
1,679mm66in
1,683mm66in
Ground clearance
238mm9in
-
Trunk volume
368L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
2,030L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
105L
CO2 emissions
186g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,400 rpm5,950 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V84,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.3 s
41.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
320 hp
239 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 has 19 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 19 hp (14 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
2,360 kg
5,203 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V86.9 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
888 km
551 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
1,207 km
750 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
320 hp
239 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
320 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
320 hp
239 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,078 kg
4,581 lb
2,360 kg
5,203 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
368 L
13.0 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
888 km
551 mi
1,207 km
750 mi
CO2 score
186 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
368 L
13.0 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 282 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 43 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

  • Has 19 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Has 319 km (198 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 182 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
4.4 V8
GL 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
4.4 V8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
2.0 T6
35i
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsBMWX6 (F16)35i
4.4 V8
4.2 TDI V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 GDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI
4.4 V8
GL 450
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
2.0 T6
3.0d V6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace3.0d V6
4.4 V8
3.6 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster