Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) · Facelift 2009 GL 450vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) · Facelift 2009

GL 450

340 hp4663 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2009-2012
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2012-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    229 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,207 km
    750 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
340hp254kW
339hp253kW
Torque
460Nm339lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,355kg5,192lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Gross weight
3,150kg6,945lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
105.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
34.4s
Calculated
41.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
746km464mi
Calculated
1,207km750mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,663cc285cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
5,099mm201in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,920mm76in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,840mm72in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
3,075mm121in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,645mm65in
1,690mm67in
Rear track
1,648mm65in
1,683mm66in
Ground clearance
198mm8in
-
Trunk volume
620L
550L
Max trunk volume
2,300L
2,030L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
100L
105L
CO2 emissions
312g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 4506,000 rpm2,700-5,000 rpm6,500 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V84,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.4 s
41.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
340 hp
254 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
460 Nm
339 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
2,355 kg
5,192 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
2,360 kg
5,203 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
235 km/h
146 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: 4.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
746 km
464 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
1,207 km
750 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
340 hp
254 kW
7.2 s
235 km/h
146 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,840 mm
72.4 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
7.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
340 hp
254 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
460 Nm
339 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
6.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,355 kg
5,192 lb
2,360 kg
5,203 lb
Fuel consumption
13.4 L/100 km
17.6 mpg US
21.1 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
5,099 mm
200.7 in
Height
1,840 mm
72.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
746 km
464 mi
1,207 km
750 mi
CO2 score
312 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
620 L
21.9 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.45 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.74 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,518 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 70 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 461 km (286 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 83 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 450
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) · Facelift 2009 GL 450 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster