Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) · Facelift 2009 GL 450vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Best estimated range1,207 km750 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score83/100
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest2,355 kg5,192 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,355kg5,192lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Gross weight | 3,150kg6,945lb | - |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 105.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.4s Calculated | 41.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.4L/100 km12.8mpg US15.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t108kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km464mi Calculated | 1,207km750mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,663cc285cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 5,099mm201in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,840mm72in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,075mm121in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,690mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,648mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 198mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,300L | 2,030L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | 312g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.4 s | 41.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450 has 1 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 7.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450 has more power, Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 746 km 464 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 1,207 km 750 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 340 hp 254 kW | 7.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 |
| 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)Facelift 2009GL 450 | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,355 kg 5,192 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.4 L/100 km 17.6 mpg US 21.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 464 mi | 1,207 km 750 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 312 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450 | Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.45 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.74 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,010 L531 US gal442 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,518 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) Facelift 2009 GL 450
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 461 km (286 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 83 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























