Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) · Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover IV
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
- Most powerful339 hp253 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lightest2,329 kg5,135 lb
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 339hp253kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,329kg5,135lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Gross weight | 2,910kg6,415lb | - |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.9s Calculated | 41.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,207km750mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 4,367cc266cu in |
| Length | 4,795mm189in | 4,999mm197in |
| Width | 1,940mm76in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,737mm68in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,893mm114in | 2,922mm115in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,690mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,658mm65in | 1,683mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 201mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 493L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,555L | 2,030L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.9 s | 41.0 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 333 hp 248 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 has 6 hp more than Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 2,329 kg 5,135 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 6.5 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 6.9 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 has more power, Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | 339 hp 253 kW | 6.9 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI | Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 339 hp 253 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,329 kg 5,135 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,207 km 750 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 493 L 17.4 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touareg II (7P) Facelift 2014 3.0 V6 TSI
- Is 31 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 57 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























