Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.6 V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014

3.6 V6

300 hp3598 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2014-2017
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV

4.4 V8

339 hp4367 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2012-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Most powerful
    339 hp
    253 kW
  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.7 L/100 km
    27.0 mpg US
    32.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.5 L/100 km
    20.5 mpg US
    24.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,207 km
    750 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    83/100

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lightest
    2,040 kg
    4,497 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    215 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    670 L
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
300hp224kW
339hp253kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
2,040kg4,497lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Gross weight
2,810kg6,195lb
-
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
96.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
86.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
35.9s
Calculated
41.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
924km574mi
Calculated
1,207km750mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,598cc220cu in
4,367cc266cu in
Length
4,855mm191in
4,999mm197in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,983mm78in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,922mm115in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,690mm67in
Rear track
1,669mm66in
1,683mm66in
Trunk volume
670L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,780L
2,030L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
105L
CO2 emissions
215g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V66,300 rpm3,000 rpm6,550 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V84,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.9 s
41.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 has 39 hp more than Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8: 39 hp (29 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
2,040 kg
4,497 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
2,360 kg
5,203 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V67.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V86.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
924 km
574 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
1,207 km
750 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
7.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
339 hp
253 kW
6.9 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
339 hp
253 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.7 s
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
339 hp
253 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
6.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
2,040 kg
4,497 lb
2,360 kg
5,203 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
924 km
574 mi
1,207 km
750 mi
CO2 score
215 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6

  • Is 320 kg lighter
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8

  • Has 39 hp more
  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 283 km (176 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II 3.6 V6
Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 V6
3.0 V6
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6vsPorscheCayenne III3.0 V6
4.4 V8
GL 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400
3.6 V6
3.0 V6
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
3.6 V6
Turbo S 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6vsPorscheCayenne IITurbo S 4.8 V8
4.4 V8
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
3.6 V6
Turbo 4.8 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6vsPorscheCayenne (955)Facelift 2007Turbo 4.8 V8
4.4 V8
GLS 400
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400
3.6 V6
Turbo 4.5 V8
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6vsPorscheCayenne (955)Turbo 4.5 V8
4.4 V8
4.2 TDI V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)4.2 TDI V8
3.6 V6
S 3.0 Diesel V6
VS
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6vsPorscheMacan I (95B)S 3.0 Diesel V6
4.4 V8
3.0 V6 GDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IV4.4 V8vsMaseratiLevante3.0 V6 GDI
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster