Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5vsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
235hp175kW
240hp179kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,976kg4,356lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,470kg5,445lb
-
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
81.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
86.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
37.3s
Calculated
42.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,183km735mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,371mm172in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,668mm66in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,673mm66in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
-
Trunk volume
505L
-
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
70L
CO2 emissions
158g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si45,800 rpm1,750 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.3 s
42.4 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has 5 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,976 kg
4,356 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si47.6 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
235 hp
175 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.6 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,976 kg
4,356 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
1,183 km
735 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
158 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 23 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 Si4
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 Si4
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 Si4
200t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 Si4
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 D5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 D5
JCW 2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
2.0 Si4
25d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsBMWX1 (F48)25d
2.0 D5
2.0 D240
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
2.0 Si4
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Si4
2.0 TFSI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster