Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2016-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    167 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    938 km
    583 mi
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDILand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,720kg3,792lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,350kg5,181lb
-
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
68.0s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
28.0s
Calculated
42.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
938km583mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,486mm177in
4,371mm172in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,673mm66in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,677mm105in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,576mm62in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
-
Trunk volume
615L
-
Max trunk volume
1,655L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
167g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDILand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si45,800 rpm1,750 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDILand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.0 s
42.4 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
228 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si47.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
938 km
583 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
228 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.5 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDILand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.6 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
938 km
583 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
167 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
140 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDILand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 Si4
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
2.0 Si4
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 Si4
200t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 BiTDI
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0 Si4
25d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsBMWX1 (F48)25d
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)2.0 TSI
2.0 Si4
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster