Porsche Macan I (95B)
2.0
237 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015
2.0 Si4
240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score87/100
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Lightest1,658 kg3,655 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range897 km558 mi
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,025kg4,464lb | 1,658kg3,655lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | - |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 86.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 42.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 867km539mi Calculated | 897km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,681mm184in | 4,371mm172in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,985mm78in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,660mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,625mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,629mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 5,800 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 42.4 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 237 hp 177 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has 3 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 6.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 7.6 s |
Although Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 867 km 539 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 897 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 237 hp 177 kW | 6.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 867 km 539 mi | 897 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 367 kg lighter
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsBMWX1 (F48)25d
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i