Car comparison

BMW X1 (F48) 25dvsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X1 (F48)

25d

231 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X1 (F48) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,575 kg
    3,472 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    147 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    137 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    981 km
    609 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX1 (F48)25dLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
231hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,575kg3,472lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
-
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
69.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
86.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
42.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
981km609mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,439mm175in
4,371mm172in
Width
1,821mm72in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,598mm63in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,561mm61in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,562mm61in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
183mm7in
-
Trunk volume
505L
-
Max trunk volume
1,550L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
70L
CO2 emissions
137g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X1 (F48) 25dLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • BMW X1 (F48) 25d: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX1 (F48)25d4,400 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,650 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si45,800 rpm1,750 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX1 (F48)25dLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
42.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
231 hp
172 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has 9 hp more than BMW X1 (F48) 25d.

The biggest power difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
235 km/h
146 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d6.6 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si47.6 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has more power, BMW X1 (F48) 25d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X1 (F48) 25d and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX1 (F48)25d
981 km
609 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX1 (F48)25d
231 hp
172 kW
6.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX1 (F48)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX1 (F48)25d
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

BMW X1 (F48) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX1 (F48)25d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.6 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX1 (F48)25d
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX1 (F48)25dLand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
231 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,439 mm
174.8 in
Height
1,598 mm
62.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
981 km
609 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
137 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X1 (F48) 25dLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X1 (F48) 25d

  • Has 110 Nm more
  • Is 83 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 44 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X1 (F48) 25d
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

25d
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX1 (E84 LCI)Facelift 201228i
2.0 Si4
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
25d
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX1 (E84)28i
2.0 Si4
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
25d
23i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX1 (U11)23i
2.0 Si4
200t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
25d
25d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 Si4
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
25d
28i
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201428i
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
25d
30d
VS
BMWX1 (F48)25dvsBMWX6 (F16)30d
2.0 Si4
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
BMW X1 (F48) 25d vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster