Car comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012

2.0 TFSI

230 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2015-2016
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015

2.0 Si4

240 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    949 km
    590 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,658 kg
    3,655 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSILand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
230hp172kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,730kg3,814lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,340kg5,159lb
-
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
85.0s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
33.4s
Calculated
42.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
949km590mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,629mm182in
4,371mm172in
Width
1,898mm75in
1,985mm78in
Height
1,655mm65in
1,660mm65in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,625mm64in
Rear track
1,614mm64in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
-
Trunk volume
540L
-
Max trunk volume
1,560L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
70L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSILand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI4,700-6,200 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,450 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si45,800 rpm1,750 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSILand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.4 s
42.4 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has 10 hp more than AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
1,730 kg
3,814 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
228 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI7.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si47.6 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 has more power, AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
949 km
590 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
230 hp
172 kW
7.2 s
228 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
240 hp
179 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSILand RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4
Power
230 hp
172 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
7.6 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,730 kg
3,814 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,629 mm
182.2 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,371 mm
172.1 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Range score
949 km
590 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSILand Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 I (8R) Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 52 km (32 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 72 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TFSI
45 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TDI
2.0 Si4
Sport 2.0 T
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
2.0 Si4
2.0d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0 TFSI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
2.0 Si4
200t
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 Si4
2.0 BiTDI
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
2.0 Si4
25d
VS
Land RoverRange Rover Evoque IFacelift 20152.0 Si4vsBMWX1 (F48)25d
AUDI Q5 I (8R) · Facelift 2012 2.0 TFSI vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque I · Facelift 2015 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster