Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 D240

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Fastest top speed
    224 km/h
    139 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,926 kg
    4,246 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    125 hp/t
    93 kW/t
    8.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.2 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
240hp179kW
235hp175kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,926kg4,246lb
1,976kg4,356lb
Gross weight
2,420kg5,335lb
2,470kg5,445lb
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
89.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
81.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
37.3s
Calculated
37.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
898km558mi
Calculated
1,183km735mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
1,234L
505L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
56L
71L
CO2 emissions
162g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D2404,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.3 s
37.3 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 has 5 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
1,926 kg
4,246 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,976 kg
4,356 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
224 km/h
139 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D2407.4 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
898 km
558 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
240 hp
179 kW
7.4 s
224 km/h
139 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 D240VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.2 s
Top speed
224 km/h
139 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,926 kg
4,246 lb
1,976 kg
4,356 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
898 km
558 mi
1,183 km
735 mi
CO2 score
162 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 50 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 729 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 285 km (177 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D240
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
2.0 D240
25d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarF-Pace25d
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 D240
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 D240
300
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 D5
Sport 2.0 T
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0 D240
2.0 D5
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
2.0 D5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 D240
2.0
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 D240vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 D5
JCW 2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
2.0 D5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 D240 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster