Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B)

2.0

252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Land Rover Discovery Sport

2.0 Si4

290 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    172 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    878 km
    546 mi
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Most powerful
    290 hp
    216 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
252hp188kW
290hp216kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,947kg4,292lb
Gross weight
2,445kg5,390lb
2,710kg5,975lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
91.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
34.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
878km546mi
Calculated
815km507mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,599mm181in
Width
1,923mm76in
2,069mm81in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,724mm68in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,741mm108in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,621mm64in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance
185mm7in
221mm9in
Trunk volume
500L
-
Max trunk volume
1,500L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
65L
69L
CO2 emissions
172g/km
190g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.05,000-6,800 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,050 rpm
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si45,800 rpm1,500 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
34.0 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has 38 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 38 hp (28 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
1,947 kg
4,292 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
229 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.06.7 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si46.7 s

Although Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
878 km
546 mi
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
815 km
507 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
6.7 s
229 km/h
142 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW
6.7 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.7 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)2.0Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
252 hp
188 kW
290 hp
216 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,947 kg
4,292 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in
Range score
878 km
546 mi
815 km
507 mi
CO2 score
172 g/km
190 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Is 177 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Has 38 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 Si4
3.0 TDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)3.0 TDI
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 Si4
2.0t
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 Si4
2.0
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0
2.0 Si4
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 Si4
2.0 T6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 Si4
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 Si4
2.0 P300
VS
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0
30d
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsBMWX6 (F16)30d
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster