Car comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.6 V6vsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014

3.6 V6

300 hp3598 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2014-2017
VS

Land Rover Discovery Sport

2.0 Si4

290 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,947 kg
    4,292 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    149 hp/t
    111 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    190 g/km
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
300hp224kW
290hp216kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,040kg4,497lb
1,947kg4,292lb
Gross weight
2,810kg6,195lb
2,710kg5,975lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
96.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
91.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
35.9s
Calculated
34.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
924km574mi
Calculated
815km507mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,598cc220cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,855mm191in
4,599mm181in
Width
1,939mm76in
2,069mm81in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,724mm68in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,741mm108in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,621mm64in
Rear track
1,669mm66in
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance-
221mm9in
Trunk volume
670L
-
Max trunk volume
1,780L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
85L
69L
CO2 emissions
215g/km
190g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4PowerTorque
  • Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V66,300 rpm3,000 rpm6,550 rpm
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si45,800 rpm1,500 rpm6,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.9 s
34.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
2,040 kg
4,497 lb
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
1,947 kg
4,292 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 has more power, Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
924 km
574 mi
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
815 km
507 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
300 hp
224 kW
7.7 s
230 km/h
143 mph
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
290 hp
216 kW
6.7 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
7.7 s
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4
Power
300 hp
224 kW
290 hp
216 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
6.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
2,040 kg
4,497 lb
1,947 kg
4,292 lb
Fuel consumption
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
670 L
23.7 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,599 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,724 mm
67.9 in
Range score
924 km
574 mi
815 km
507 mi
CO2 score
215 g/km
190 g/km
Trunk score
670 L
23.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
147 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.10 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.91 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,415 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4

  • Is 93 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Cayenne II 3.6 V6
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 vs Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster