Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne II · Facelift 2014 3.6 V6vsLand Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Discovery Sport
2.0 Si4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,947 kg4,292 lb
- Best power-to-weight149 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions190 g/km
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score84/100
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range924 km574 mi
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 290hp216kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,947kg4,292lb |
| Gross weight | 2,810kg6,195lb | 2,710kg5,975lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 91.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.9s Calculated | 34.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 924km574mi Calculated | 815km507mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,598cc220cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,855mm191in | 4,599mm181in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 2,069mm81in |
| Height | 1,705mm67in | 1,724mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,741mm108in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,621mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,669mm66in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 670L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | 215g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 5,800 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.9 s | 34.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW |
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 has 10 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 7.7 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 6.7 s |
Although Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 has more power, Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 and Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 924 km 574 mi |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 815 km 507 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 290 hp 216 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.6 V6 | Land RoverDiscovery Sport2.0 Si4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 290 hp 216 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 924 km 574 mi | 815 km 507 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 215 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 670 L 23.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6 | Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne II Facelift 2014 3.6 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 108 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 Si4
- Is 93 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























