Car comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P290vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019

2.0 P290

290 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2020-present
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290

  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,961 kg
    4,323 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    148 hp/t
    110 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    882 km
    548 mi
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Largest trunk
    314 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
290hp216kW
310hp231kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,961kg4,323lb
2,146kg4,731lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
86.5s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
81.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
31.1s
Calculated
30.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
882km548mi
Calculated
855km532mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,597mm181in
4,950mm195in
Width-
1,923mm76in
Height
1,727mm68in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,741mm108in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,636mm64in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,643mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
238mm9in
Trunk volume
157L
314L
Max trunk volume
1,651L
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
67L
71L
CO2 emissions-
192g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P2905,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.1 s
30.3 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
290 hp
216 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 20 hp more than Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290.

The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
1,961 kg
4,323 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
233 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P2907.0 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
882 km
548 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
290 hp
216 kW
7.0 s
233 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
157 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
Power
290 hp
216 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
7.0 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLand RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
290 hp
216 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
6.5 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,961 kg
4,323 lb
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Fuel consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
157 L
5.5 cu ft
Length
4,597 mm
181.0 in
Height
1,727 mm
68.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
882 km
548 mi
855 km
532 mi
CO2 score
-
192 g/km
Trunk score
157 L
5.5 cu ft
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
148 hp/t
110 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLand Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.30 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.40 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,995 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Land Rover Discovery Sport Facelift 2019 2.0 P290

  • Is 185 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 157 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Land Rover Discovery Sport 2.0 P290
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P290
3.0d
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0 P290
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 P290
50 TDI
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 P290
30d V6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 P290
GLS 350d
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 350d
2.0 P290
2.0 GME
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290vsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
2.0 P290
50 TDI V6
VS
Land RoverDiscovery SportFacelift 20192.0 P290vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
Land Rover Discovery Sport · Facelift 2019 2.0 P290 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster